UK Expansion

UK Expansions with PD
Strategy: PD
Required upgrades: Air Transport Capacity and Faster Ground Main Defence
Difficulty: 3/5 (straight forward movements)
Variation 1: Rush Netherlands





Variation 2: Rush Denmark





Variation 3: Rush Belgium





Comments:
Whatever you do, use only Infantry and naval transports. In the case of rushing Denmark, you'll need 2 transports. For the other two variations you can use the same transport forth and back.
Wall Dublin (Ireland), wall London and wall Birmingham. In the case of the Denmark rush, you may wall other cities in UK.
Always WF the cities you are rushing. Although it is improbable that your opponent walls any of these cities (specially in Netherlands and Belgium), you don't want to risk to have you major stack not being able to move the next turn.
In a 3v3 game as UK you are usually confronted with Germany. The question is: are you allied to France or Spain? If you are allied to France, the best options are to rush Netherlands or Denmark. The Denmark option is more aggressive and puts Germany on big pressure. Rushing Belgium is risky if France decides to rush it as well; it isn't probable but may happen (see below).

http://atwardatabase.weebly.com/uploads/3/8/6/0/38607571/6320563_orig.jpg

Srategy: Naval Commander
Required Upgrades: Naval Trans Capacity,
Difficulty (3/5)




Movements:
Wall London and Birmingham with 5 militia
Build and transfer 20 infantry into Tyneside, Use 1 Sea trans and send all to Oslo
With the reinforcements you have left and all remaining infantry, (Around 16 Infantry send through London and use the Denmark passage to attack Copenhagen.
This works well with Germany as opponent and France as ally, I is best to use the infantry in Norway to defend UK cities, and you should have reinforcements also in the UK, make the movement from Norway back to UK first to reduce the chance of being turnbloced.

Outdated and lame

Who rushes...Denmark?

作者： Asylan, 04.12.2017 at 11:58

Who rushes...Denmark?

It is very good. Use it when facing germany in a 3v3, its strategic location and decent income make it a nice expansion.

I am not a 3v3er :notlikeduck:

Denmark rush suck ass!

作者： Checkmate., 04.12.2017 at 15:14

作者： Asylan, 04.12.2017 at 11:58

Who rushes...Denmark?

It is very good. Use it when facing germany in a 3v3, its strategic location and decent income make it a nice expansion.

>decent income
>150

>fml

作者： Witch-Doctor, 04.12.2017 at 21:49

作者： Checkmate., 04.12.2017 at 15:14

作者： Asylan, 04.12.2017 at 11:58

Who rushes...Denmark?

It is very good. Use it when facing germany in a 3v3, its strategic location and decent income make it a nice expansion.

>decent income
>150

>fml

Is that not decent?

作者： Checkmate., 04.12.2017 at 21:57

作者： Witch-Doctor, 04.12.2017 at 21:49

作者： Checkmate., 04.12.2017 at 15:14

作者： Asylan, 04.12.2017 at 11:58

Who rushes...Denmark?

It is very good. Use it when facing germany in a 3v3, its strategic location and decent income make it a nice expansion.

>decent income
>150

>fml

Is that not decent?

wd prefers to rush moscow

作者： Checkmate., 04.12.2017 at 21:57

作者： Witch-Doctor, 04.12.2017 at 21:49

作者： Checkmate., 04.12.2017 at 15:14

作者： Asylan, 04.12.2017 at 11:58

Who rushes...Denmark?

It is very good. Use it when facing germany in a 3v3, its strategic location and decent income make it a nice expansion.

>decent income
>150

>fml

Is that not decent?

swiss > denmark

作者： Asylan, 04.12.2017 at 15:17

I am not a 3v3er :notlikeduck:

that's why you're not so good at the game.

Taking denmark t1 is the best way to control scandi. You can also take germ cities

Denmark sucks ass dont rush denmark

作者： Wheelo, 07.12.2017 at 18:49

Taking denmark t1 is the best way to control scandi. You can also take germ cities

Belgium > denmark

作者： 4nic, 07.12.2017 at 19:12

作者： Wheelo, 07.12.2017 at 18:49

Taking denmark t1 is the best way to control scandi. You can also take germ cities

Belgium > denmark

not if germ walls off scandi

作者： 4nic, 07.12.2017 at 19:12

作者： Wheelo, 07.12.2017 at 18:49

Taking denmark t1 is the best way to control scandi. You can also take germ cities

Belgium > denmark

in terms of income, yes. Positioning, no.

作者： Checkmate., 08.12.2017 at 10:05

作者： 4nic, 07.12.2017 at 19:12

作者： Wheelo, 07.12.2017 at 18:49

Taking denmark t1 is the best way to control scandi. You can also take germ cities

Belgium > denmark

in terms of income, yes. Positioning, no.

No.

You cant defend london when your stack is in denmark.

作者： Witch-Doctor, 08.12.2017 at 11:48

作者： Checkmate., 08.12.2017 at 10:05

作者： 4nic, 07.12.2017 at 19:12

作者： Wheelo, 07.12.2017 at 18:49

Taking denmark t1 is the best way to control scandi. You can also take germ cities

Belgium > denmark

in terms of income, yes. Positioning, no.

No.

You cant defend london when your stack is in denmark.

That would only be a problem if you get wf'd t1 :p

作者： Checkmate., 08.12.2017 at 11:53

作者： Witch-Doctor, 08.12.2017 at 11:48

作者： Checkmate., 08.12.2017 at 10:05

作者： 4nic, 07.12.2017 at 19:12

作者： Wheelo, 07.12.2017 at 18:49

Taking denmark t1 is the best way to control scandi. You can also take germ cities

Belgium > denmark

in terms of income, yes. Positioning, no.

No.

You cant defend london when your stack is in denmark.

That would only be a problem if you get wf'd t1 :p

13 into denmark 1st prio, wall gen and jew uk, lm belg and nl.

Iw ould rather suck 14 cocks and get mutilated than to go to denmark

作者： gothboy, 12.12.2017 at 15:27

Iw ould rather suck 14 cocks and get mutilated than to go to denmark

that is true

Spain rush?

None of those expansions are any good? why would you ever only take one or two cities? thats silly.

作者： superrmatt, 30.07.2018 at 08:52

None of those expansions are any good? why would you ever only take one or two cities? thats silly.

Most of this expansions are for 3v3s or coalition wars.