New poll

There is much controversy about it and would like to end it here,
post your arguments to defend your opinion so we can legitimize an agreement

Depends on what was decided pre-match. The unspoken rule is that it is allowed though.

作者： NateBaller, 04.03.2012 at 02:18

Depends on what was decided pre-match. The unspoken rule is that it is allowed though.

it is allowed, but some players get mad and leave the game
if you can make a wall around a neutral city you can wallf**** a neutral citie

Players disagree only for their own benefit, like cow that say everytime to don't use wallglitch in first turn and in some games does

What's wall glitching? Is that just making walls around a neutral city?

Placing a unit near a neutral city so your enemy cannot wall it as he takes it.

Oh, then I see no problem with that. It's a legit strategy. Sure it might piss them off, but since when did anyone not get pissed in a game?

It must be a legal action, otherwise it would also be illegal to attack a neutral city, which your opponent might attack too.

I say no. Its fun to wall glitch on your opponents

作者： Safari, 06.03.2012 at 08:21

It must be a legal action, otherwise it would also be illegal to attack a neutral city, which your opponent might attack too.

u kidding ?

作者： reckoner., 09.03.2012 at 08:42

作者： Safari, 06.03.2012 at 08:21

It must be a legal action, otherwise it would also be illegal to attack a neutral city, which your opponent might attack too.

u kidding ?

i think you missunderstood me. i meant that wall glitching must be legal, because attacking a neutral city, which you opponent might attack is a similar action. And this is a legal and it should be legal.

First turnblocking on enemy cities has a luck element in it, so it shoudn't be allowed. Wallglitch a neutral city has not. Therfor: No, its not illegal and it also should not be. If you are a good player and don't do the predictable moves, then you don't have to worry about wallglitching on neutrals.

作者： reckoner., 04.03.2012 at 08:45

Players disagree only for their own benefit, like cow that say everytime to don't use wallglitch in first turn and in some games does

It is called wallfuck and not wallglitch. Wallglitching is something completely different.
Also stop telling lies about me please. I always ask in the beginning of a game if players agree with neutral wallfucks or not. Of course I will use them as well if the others do.

作者： Guest, 09.03.2012 at 13:07

作者： reckoner., 04.03.2012 at 08:45

Players disagree only for their own benefit, like cow that say everytime to don't use wallglitch in first turn and in some games does

It is called wallfuck and not wallglitch. Wallglitching is something completely different.
Also stop telling lies about me please. I always ask in the beginning of a game if players agree with neutral wallfucks or not. Of course I will use them as well if the others do.

ok, but wallfuck songs bad to the poll title
that's no lie
and this is the purpose of the topic: end these biased agreements in the beginning of a game

作者： reckoner., 10.03.2012 at 07:43

and this is the purpose of the topic: end these biased agreements in the beginning of a game

Since there is no standard rule about neutral-wallfucks as about first-turn-turnblocks, first turn agreements are necessary.

作者： Guest, 10.03.2012 at 13:48

作者： reckoner., 10.03.2012 at 07:43

and this is the purpose of the topic: end these biased agreements in the beginning of a game

Since there is no standard rule about neutral-wallfucks as about first-turn-turnblocks, first turn agreements are necessary.

now we have a standart rule because we have 18 votes vs 6 votes ok

作者： reckoner., 10.03.2012 at 15:01

作者： Guest, 10.03.2012 at 13:48

作者： reckoner., 10.03.2012 at 07:43

and this is the purpose of the topic: end these biased agreements in the beginning of a game

Since there is no standard rule about neutral-wallfucks as about first-turn-turnblocks, first turn agreements are necessary.

now we have a standart rule because we have 18 votes vs 6 votes ok

>implying 30 votes in a forum poll reflect the opinion of the whole community. no sry
Also you asked if it is 'illegal'. Of course it's not, neither are first turn blocks.

Well Cow I'm afraid if these results go on the answer will be "NO."

You and your autism, taking everything in the literal sense

How the hell can it be illigal be caging people in in a unbreakable cage! unless u break it from outside, common now