获得高级隐藏所有广告
发表: 28   谁浏览过: 109 users
15.01.2021 - 20:27
 Witch-Doctor (版主)
Since RA, MOS, SM, Blitz all got buffed, can we take a look at buffing NC? I feel that NC is getting power-creeped and needs a little buff.

I think a good buff for NC is to reduce their marine cost by an additional 30.
This would give NC a slight buff that it needs to stay relevant.

With this, NC marines will cost 120 which is as much as tanks. This would give NC a more viable ground attack unit than NC tanks which are god-awful. I also think buffing NC marines also fits the theme of naval commander. Marines sync well with NC submarines and people think of marines as a "naval operations" kind of unit.
载入中...
载入中...
15.01.2021 - 20:48
I am lelouch and I approve this message
----
载入中...
载入中...
15.01.2021 - 20:56
----
Deutsch überwältigt

载入中...
载入中...
15.01.2021 - 22:23
We already have enough strats for stealths, need a missile unit for ships to carry and fire!!!!
载入中...
载入中...
15.01.2021 - 22:24
 Witch-Doctor (版主)
作者: sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 22:23

We already have enough strats for stealths, need a missile unit for ships to carry and fire!!!!


GW, MOS. HW

3/13 strat is too much? Besides this won't make NC a stealth strat. It's still primarily an infantry/ship spam strat with stealth as an option.
载入中...
载入中...
15.01.2021 - 22:55
 Lelouch. (版主)
Noice
载入中...
载入中...
15.01.2021 - 23:27
作者: Witch-Doctor, 15.01.2021 at 22:24

作者: sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 22:23

We already have enough strats for stealths, need a missile unit for ships to carry and fire!!!!


GW, MOS.

2/13 strat is too much? Besides this won't make NC a stealth strat. It's still primarily an infantry/ship spam strat with stealth as an option.


and CO , thats 3 strats specificly designed for stealths, we need missilesssssss launched by nc shipssssssssss
载入中...
载入中...
15.01.2021 - 23:49
Can we at least get IF militia 1 range just enough to wall lol
----
Deutsch überwältigt

载入中...
载入中...
16.01.2021 - 03:52
作者: Richthofen, 15.01.2021 at 23:49

Can we at least get IF militia 1 range just enough to wall lol

----
载入中...
载入中...
16.01.2021 - 04:20
Evet
----

载入中...
载入中...
16.01.2021 - 10:13
作者: Xenomega, 16.01.2021 at 10:09

Just add rivers to world map that connect to some capitals then you could use some destroyers to attack inland


give macho men unit that can carry 1 range ships over lands like vikings did !!!
载入中...
载入中...
16.01.2021 - 17:40
Just add aircraft carrier (same unit like in ww2) to nc and close this topic forever.
----



http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=14714&topicsearch=&page=
载入中...
载入中...
16.01.2021 - 17:43
Yeah aircraft carrier, or perhaps add the aircraft carrier to a separate strategy
----
Happiness = reality - expectations
载入中...
载入中...
16.01.2021 - 18:20
作者: Tribune Aquila, 16.01.2021 at 17:43

Yeah aircraft carrier, or perhaps add the aircraft carrier to a separate strategy

----
Deutsch überwältigt

载入中...
载入中...
16.01.2021 - 19:27
 Alex
I 100% support
----
Orcs are a horde, much like Turks. Elves and Men are light skinned, Orcs are often darker/sallow skinned, like Turks.

Istanbul?Thats not how you pronounce Constantinople
载入中...
载入中...
17.01.2021 - 04:25
Add HP to NC ships.
----
...још сте ту...
载入中...
载入中...
17.01.2021 - 04:35
To be honest, aircraft carriers would be a good idea. It would also be a buff to strats to Aerial Defender.
----
载入中...
载入中...
17.01.2021 - 10:42
Support
载入中...
载入中...
18.01.2021 - 21:17
I really don't see the need to buff Marines.

If we all want to buff NC by giving a bit more ground strenght, than let's just make Tanks less awful.
载入中...
载入中...
18.01.2021 - 21:19
 Witch-Doctor (版主)
作者: Estus, 18.01.2021 at 21:17

I really don't see the need to buff Marines.

If we all want to buff NC by giving a bit more ground strenght, than let's just make Tanks less awful.


Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy
载入中...
载入中...
18.01.2021 - 21:26
作者: Witch-Doctor, 18.01.2021 at 21:19

Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy

That depends, NC still a naval-oriented Strategy afterall.

Cheaper Marines would also make NC mobility even higher considering the huge amount of upgrades that they have.
载入中...
载入中...
18.01.2021 - 21:29
 Witch-Doctor (版主)
作者: Estus, 18.01.2021 at 21:26

作者: Witch-Doctor, 18.01.2021 at 21:19

Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy

That depends, NC still a naval-oriented Strategy afterall.

Cheaper Marines would also make NC mobility even higher considering the huge amount of upgrades that they have.


The mobility is still the same considering 90% of your army is infantry, 8% transports, 2% others.
Marines don't go any further than infantry and transport.
载入中...
载入中...
19.01.2021 - 00:13
作者: Witch-Doctor, 18.01.2021 at 21:19

作者: Estus, 18.01.2021 at 21:17

I really don't see the need to buff Marines.

If we all want to buff NC by giving a bit more ground strenght, than let's just make Tanks less awful.


Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy



navy deploys all forces even tanks... xd
载入中...
载入中...
19.01.2021 - 00:30
作者: sirivann, 19.01.2021 at 00:13

作者: Witch-Doctor, 18.01.2021 at 21:19

作者: Estus, 18.01.2021 at 21:17

I really don't see the need to buff Marines.

If we all want to buff NC by giving a bit more ground strenght, than let's just make Tanks less awful.


Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy



navy deploys all forces even tanks... xd

In what nation does the navy utilizes tanks?
----
Deutsch überwältigt

载入中...
载入中...
19.01.2021 - 02:14
作者: Richthofen, 19.01.2021 at 00:30

In what nation does the navy utilizes tanks?

Most of them.
载入中...
载入中...
19.01.2021 - 03:01
作者: Estus, 19.01.2021 at 02:14

作者: Richthofen, 19.01.2021 at 00:30

In what nation does the navy utilizes tanks?

Most of them.

Most military uses structures. Majority of land vehicles are operated and utilized within all armies. The only time any navy have tanks are to transport them.
The Deutsches Heer operates and owns all tanks. The deutches marine doesn't have a single tank in its inventory. But doesn't mean the marine transport then.

Same goes for the us navy. No tanks in its inventory nor operates but can carry army tanks overseas.
----
Deutsch überwältigt

载入中...
载入中...
19.01.2021 - 10:09
作者: Richthofen, 19.01.2021 at 00:30

作者: sirivann, 19.01.2021 at 00:13

作者: Witch-Doctor, 18.01.2021 at 21:19

作者: Estus, 18.01.2021 at 21:17

I really don't see the need to buff Marines.

If we all want to buff NC by giving a bit more ground strenght, than let's just make Tanks less awful.


Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy



navy deploys all forces even tanks... xd

In what nation does the navy utilizes tanks?


da fuck u think all tanks are just brought via plane??? xDDD
载入中...
载入中...
19.01.2021 - 10:10
作者: Richthofen, 19.01.2021 at 03:01

作者: Estus, 19.01.2021 at 02:14

作者: Richthofen, 19.01.2021 at 00:30

In what nation does the navy utilizes tanks?

Most of them.

Most military uses structures. Majority of land vehicles are operated and utilized within all armies. The only time any navy have tanks are to transport them.
The Deutsches Heer operates and owns all tanks. The deutches marine doesn't have a single tank in its inventory. But doesn't mean the marine transport then.

Same goes for the us navy. No tanks in its inventory nor operates but can carry army tanks overseas.


thats why i said deploy nigga
载入中...
载入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隐私条例 | 服务条例 | 横额 | Partners

Copyright © 2025 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我们在

将游戏传播出去!