Strategy idea: Amphibious warfare

The Idea of this is to be an offensive strategy that you can use to launch naval invasions, similar to how NC is used a lot. NC a lot of the times is used for faster transports with higher capacity, this strat is supposed to be similar to that, one you can use to launch amphibious assaults like a WW2 usa sending units to europe. The basis of the stat was compared to that of Naval commander while attempting to not retcon NC's usefulness as a strategy
Since the strat is supposed to be primarily an offensive strat, most ground units get a defensive nerf so if you need that defensive value you can use NC instead


Transports: +7 capacity -30 cost +2 crit +3 attack +1 defense +2 hp +5 range
Submarines: +2 capacity +3 attack +2 defense +2 crit -30 cost +5 range
Marines: +1 attack -1 defense -30 cost, -1 range, -1 defense in own city
Infantry: +1 attack -1 defense, -1 range
Tanks: -1 attack & Defense -2 crit -1 range, -1 defense in own city
Bombers: +30 cost
Helicopters: +30 cost
Stealth: +30 cost
Air transport: +30 cost
Thoughts,opinions, critiques?

Not exactly sure which map this would be played in. Considering 80% of capturable cities and capitals are on land and it also seems like an expensive strat.
Seems useless really

作者： PleaseMe, 04.02.2019 at 19:33

Not exactly sure which map this would be played in. Considering 80% of capturable cities and capitals are on land and it also seems like an expensive strat.
Seems useless really

True but it's supposed to be used as a strategy for better transportation, which is what people tend to use NC for in many cases. NC is meant to be used for stronger ships in general but a lot of time only gets used for transport upgrades and this meant to be used a true "transportation" strategy for those who just want the range and capacity bonuses plus little extra

作者： Black Vortex, 04.02.2019 at 19:51

作者： PleaseMe, 04.02.2019 at 19:33

Not exactly sure which map this would be played in. Considering 80% of capturable cities and capitals are on land and it also seems like an expensive strat.
Seems useless really

True but it's supposed to be used as a strategy for better transportation, which is what people tend to use NC for in many cases. NC is meant to be used for stronger ships in general but a lot of time only gets used for transport upgrades and this meant to be used a true "transportation" strategy for those who just want the range and capacity bonuses plus little extra

You could just build another sea transport. They aren't very expensive. I just don't think theres any real reason to use this strategy.

作者： EPSON2, 04.02.2019 at 21:01

Strat is useless with this garbage inf.

Only drawbacks for inf is -1 range and -1 defense but the -1 range is easily offset with faster infantry upgrade making -1 defense only downside

作者： PleaseMe, 04.02.2019 at 20:39

You could just build another sea transport. They aren't very expensive. I just don't think theres any real reason to use this strategy.

Comparing the transport stats to that of NC which it's intended to be an alternative to, it'd be +2 range, +2 capacity +3 attack with 20 more cost versus NC transports. I didn't dare try to increase the capacity any further than 2 because with upgrades you'd could carry a shit ton of troops with a single TP

Way too similiar to nc ..
You realize with upgrades transports would then become 4 att with 12 hp thats kinda strong ..
other than that the strat is just weak cause defense less and expensive