获得高级隐藏所有广告
发表: 7   谁浏览过: 38 users
02.11.2015 - 08:38
Dunno if this has been proposed. RA as a strategy was tank general in afterwind. This name is misnomer now since it isn't exactly a relentless attack.

My proposal for ra is to rename it is as tank general and make a new strategy as relentless atttack with following configurations :
tanks : -10 cost +1 range +1 attack -1 defense
Infantry same price +1 attack -1 defense -1hp
militia same price + 1 range -1 defense
bombers same price +1 attack -2 defense
marines same price +1attack -2 defense

Basically now you have a strategy with very strong attack capable of strong rushes but very weak defensively. You can use it take one player out but it leaves you very vulnerable in defense.

I think this is worth a try. Also do feel free to suggest your own configurations.
----
载入中...
载入中...
02.11.2015 - 10:57
Dont we like have enough Tank based strategies??

I would like to see a some more of stealth/naval type strategy, but thats my opinion lel. I don't even play though, still just a comment
----





作者: Guest14502, 11.10.2014 at 09:44

Waffel for mod 2015
载入中...
载入中...
02.11.2015 - 11:06
The strategy seems fairly reasonable (but very rushy and noob-attractive) but is it really needed? And why would we need a one unit strat when the community as a whole (well, most of it) has worked to remove that trend?
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?


载入中...
载入中...
02.11.2015 - 12:34
作者: Waffel, 02.11.2015 at 10:57

Dont we like have enough Tank based strategies??

I would like to see a some more of stealth/naval type strategy, but thats my opinion lel. I don't even play though, still just a comment

This isn't exactly tank based but rather attack oriented. you can maybe compare it to blitz a bit. tank genral has 1 dimensional play where you can only use tanks. with this you can use tanks infantry militia marines and even bombers to rush. its going to be little expensive though but best possible strat for rushing but weak defensively.
----
载入中...
载入中...
02.11.2015 - 12:36
作者: The Tactician, 02.11.2015 at 11:06

The strategy seems fairly reasonable (but very rushy and noob-attractive) but is it really needed? And why would we need a one unit strat when the community as a whole (well, most of it) has worked to remove that trend?

this isn't 1 unit strat but 5 units with enhanced attack power for making strong rushes but is weak defensively. I agree about being rushy and noob attractive but its still worth a try.
----
载入中...
载入中...
02.11.2015 - 12:40
Tank General is an inappropriated name, considering the current RA boost bombers and destroyers...
载入中...
载入中...
02.11.2015 - 12:54
作者: minusSeven, 02.11.2015 at 12:36

作者: The Tactician, 02.11.2015 at 11:06

The strategy seems fairly reasonable (but very rushy and noob-attractive) but is it really needed? And why would we need a one unit strat when the community as a whole (well, most of it) has worked to remove that trend?

this isn't 1 unit strat but 5 units with enhanced attack power for making strong rushes but is weak defensively. I agree about being rushy and noob attractive but its still worth a try.

I meant making RA a one unit strat called tank general as you proposed. Your proposed strategy might be worth looking at to tweak RA though.
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?


载入中...
载入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隐私条例 | 服务条例 | 横额 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我们在

将游戏传播出去!