获得高级隐藏所有广告
发表: 13   谁浏览过: 46 users
17.12.2013 - 19:55
 KYBL
I am working on a 1400s scenario and now making Australia. Compared to the rest of the world, 1400's Australia was full of cavemen and backwards aboriginals. Because of this, they do not get the regular infantry, cavalry, etc. that other places get. However, I am planning to add over 100 tiny tribes within Australia and it is extremely annoying to try and group every single one into numerous different "excluded" lists for each individual unit. Instead, it would be much easier if we could group the entire region together and add it in to units excluded/included as a region. This would make things much faster and easier for map makers.
----

载入中...
载入中...
17.12.2013 - 20:22
 Utah
FINALLY SOMEONE ELSE UNDERSTANDS.

SUPPORT!!!!1
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
载入中...
载入中...
17.12.2013 - 21:09
Or you could use the "only avariable in X country"
载入中...
载入中...
18.12.2013 - 07:03
 Utah
作者: Tundy, 17.12.2013 at 21:09

Or you could use the "only avariable in X country"


That would fix it for him but not for everyone else.
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
载入中...
载入中...
18.12.2013 - 07:05
作者: Utah, 18.12.2013 at 07:03

作者: Tundy, 17.12.2013 at 21:09

Or you could use the "only avariable in X country"


That would fix it for him but not for everyone else.


作者: KYBL, 17.12.2013 at 19:55

..However, I am planning to add over 100 tiny tribes within Australia and it is extremely annoying to try and group every single one into numerous different "excluded" lists for each individual unit..


I wouldn't want to click exclude for every country 100 times..
载入中...
载入中...
18.12.2013 - 07:17
Death1812
账户已删除
作者: Utah, 17.12.2013 at 20:22

FINALLY SOMEONE ELSE UNDERSTANDS.

SUPPORT!!!!1
载入中...
载入中...
18.12.2013 - 07:34
Support
----
载入中...
载入中...
18.12.2013 - 08:18
 KYBL
作者: Tundy, 17.12.2013 at 21:09

Or you could use the "only avariable in X country"

The problem is it would still take a shit ton of time.
----

载入中...
载入中...
18.12.2013 - 12:15
I approve of this.
----
作者: Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30

I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
载入中...
载入中...
10.02.2014 - 18:19
 Utah
For fuck's sake admins, if you will add anything add this! This is making maps way too tedious to make.
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
载入中...
载入中...
10.02.2014 - 18:22
Support.
----
[img]http://i.imgur.com/4TrCT5Z.png?1[/img]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/JpNbfAX.png[/img]
载入中...
载入中...
10.02.2014 - 18:27
Yes, I agree with this. It'd also be nice if we could just assign specific units directly to a scenario side/player rather than to their home countries.
载入中...
载入中...
10.02.2014 - 19:55
作者: FoxxyR, 10.02.2014 at 18:27

Yes, I agree with this. It'd also be nice if we could just assign specific units directly to a scenario side/player rather than to their home countries.

Support
----
载入中...
载入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隐私条例 | 服务条例 | 横额 | Partners

Copyright © 2025 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我们在

将游戏传播出去!