Coalition War ranking alternatives?

I'm not sure if this has been suggested (I searched and did not find one pertaining to the topic), I was thinking of an alternative today.

So CWs right now are kind of whack. You could be doing completely swell and your coalition will still not rank at the top. This example was made by I forgot which coalition but the idea was that if they went 10-0 (w/l) they still couldn't be the top coalition.

So, this got me concerned. As a clan leader myself, I have little incentive to actually throw my comrades into CWs knowing that their efforts may prove fruitless. Now imagine other clans. Imagine all the clans that don't exist now because CWs offer little to no drive- no initiative. Clearly, that is not the environment we want on Atwar.

Solution? I propose that coalition rankings are based on ratios of sorts. Like "best 2 out of 3" styles. So say Clan 1 has 10/10, and Clan 2 has 19/20- clan 2 is higher up. It's a very simple system and I assure you it's very simple to implement. The more you win the higher ranked your coalition is. Of course if you don't play many CWs the odds of you getting more wins is less. Though, I think it may be too simple. So I was hoping to elicit a response from the S&I community in order to refine the idea or facilitate new ones.

I'd much appreciate it.

作者： Anon, 08.08.2013 at 06:49

I mostly like how it is, it makes more sense because if a clan has lost lots and has low CP then the clan who beats them won't get much, it is fair really.

He is talking about how there is no enough games for top 10 coalitions to play each other and they end up playing againts noob clans to farm the points.

Maybe if plays per season increased to 20 it will be more competition since top clans will have to play agints other top clans to get the points.

作者： Tundy, 08.08.2013 at 08:08

作者： Anon, 08.08.2013 at 06:49

I mostly like how it is, it makes more sense because if a clan has lost lots and has low CP then the clan who beats them won't get much, it is fair really.

He is talking about how there is no enough games for top 10 coalitions to play each other and they end up playing againts noob clans to farm the points.

Maybe if plays per season increased to 20 it will be more competition since top clans will have to play agints other top clans to get the points.

Yeah, this is what I'm talking about.

And as we all know from experience Farmer John isn't really happy to be farming, just to lounge in the spoils.

Yeah the current system needs to change. Stalins Martians went 8-2 for the season, highest ratio out of all, and we aren't even in the top three. Plus we played 25 more clan wars AFTER our 10 games for the season had ended. We're not too troubled by it, we just want some clan wars, but sooner or later other clans will have the same experience.

The system needs to be reworked.

This really should be looked into by other people as well. I'm going to pass the link around and hopefully we get more people to engage in discussion!

作者： Desu, 11.08.2013 at 16:54

Yeah the current system needs to change. Stalins Martians went 8-2 for the season, highest ratio out of all, and we aren't even in the top three. Plus we played 25 more clan wars AFTER our 10 games for the season had ended. We're not too troubled by it, we just want some clan wars, but sooner or later other clans will have the same experience.

The system needs to be reworked.

yes i agree i think its not fair.
make cw's 20 i think is a good place to start.any clan not able to make 20 games doesnt deserve to be top 3 anyway.