30 max players

We need 30 in world games ....

So true 30 max players would be the best christmas treat

Yes we could have some epic games !!! imagine world ffa or ancient world ffa--- gG

作者： Ferlucci1389, 27.11.2014 at 18:03

Yes we could have some epic games !!! imagine world ffa or ancient world ffa--- gG

More SP for me

woops I didnt mean that, please ignore

I support.

Isn't this thread redundant? There are several other threads discussing increase of player limit.

On an unrelated note, full support. More players in a game tends to be good thing, even if it lags to high heavens.

Imagin the servers going down if games with 20+ players would take place we might wanne wait for this improvement after html5 is here

作者： Azula., 28.11.2014 at 00:39

Imagin the servers going down if games with 20+ players would take place we might wanne wait for this improvement after html5 is here

Htlm5 is here

Lol
I support

20 players take 4 hour let guess how much day will take if it 30 players.

Even 5 player world games take 4 hours. Also, most of those 20 players will have left by turn 10.

Support.. Most players die in the first 20 turns, the rest will have a long war.

作者： CollegeDegree, 12.03.2016 at 19:54

作者： Azula., 28.11.2014 at 00:39

Imagin the servers going down if games with 20+ players would take place we might wanne wait for this improvement after html5 is here

Htlm5 is here

yea gg servers still broke

Support

This can really work for long and big scenarios.

The RP community has been asking for this since it all began. Full support

I fullyl support this

Support

Get us more players to play them first.

作者： PleaseMe, 27.06.2016 at 18:08

Get us more players to play them first.

And mapmaker, to make 30 player scenarios.

作者： PleaseMe, 27.06.2016 at 18:08

Get us more players to play them first.

agree

作者： CollegeDegree, 27.06.2016 at 10:01

I fullyl support this

no

作者： 5th SS Wiking, 01.04.2016 at 13:21

The RP community has been asking for this since it all began. Full support

no

作者： Weisser Wolf, 23.03.2016 at 20:24

Support

This can really work for long and big scenarios.

no

Lol 30... we can't even reach 6 in a single game .........

Ehm 30? LMAO.
We can't play even rps with 20 imagine with 30.No thx.
With 50% of atwar :trolls and idiots, we would wait 3 hours to start that game.

作者： Free_Warrior, 10.07.2016 at 16:29

Ehm 30? LMAO.
We can't play even rps with 20 imagine with 30.No thx.
With 50% of atwar :trolls and idiots, we would wait 3 hours to start that game.

3 hours to start a rp? you must still be living in 2014 atwar

作者： Free_Warrior, 10.07.2016 at 16:29

Ehm 30? LMAO.
We can't play even rps with 20 imagine with 30.No thx.
With 50% of atwar :trolls and idiots, we would wait 3 hours to start that game.

Nobody says the games have to be filled to thirty. You would still be able to play RPs with 15 or 20 players. That's what "maximum" means.

It will just mean that there will be the option to have more than twenty players should the circumstances enable it.

作者： International, 11.07.2016 at 01:49

作者： Free_Warrior, 10.07.2016 at 16:29

Ehm 30? LMAO.
We can't play even rps with 20 imagine with 30.No thx.
With 50% of atwar :trolls and idiots, we would wait 3 hours to start that game.

Nobody says the games have to be filled to thirty. You would still be able to play RPs with 15 or 20 players. That's what "maximum" means.

It will just mean that there will be the option to have more than twenty players should the circumstances enable it.

But why people need what? 30 players is too much.If nobody says the game have to be filed to thirty why u need thirty players then?

作者： Free_Warrior, 11.07.2016 at 11:28

But why people need what? 30 players is too much.If nobody says the game have to be filed to thirty why u need thirty players then?

Because, as you can see from the considerable support backing this proposal, there exists certain situations where 30 players are preferable to 20. I cannot believe that you haven't understood this yet.

If the maximum player limit is raised to 30 players, the games will not need to be filled with that many, but it can be. There is an extremely clear distinction there. Raising the max player limit to 30 will literally not forbid anything that is currently permitted, but it will permit games which previously was not possible to be hosted. I don't understand why this fact seems to not be understood by so many people.

作者： International, 12.07.2016 at 07:49

作者： Free_Warrior, 11.07.2016 at 11:28

But why people need what? 30 players is too much.If nobody says the game have to be filed to thirty why u need thirty players then?

Because, as you can see from the considerable support backing this proposal, there exists certain situations where 30 players are preferable to 20. I cannot believe that you haven't understood this yet.

If the maximum player limit is raised to 30 players, the games will not need to be filled with that many, but it can be. There is an extremely clear distinction there. Raising the max player limit to 30 will literally not forbid anything that is currently permitted, but it will permit games which previously was not possible to be hosted. I don't understand why this fact seems to not be understood by so many people.

So if u don't want to fill a game with 30 players why u need what then? If we can't host games with 20 players cause it's tood fificult how we can host games with more than 20? This proposal has non sense and all u know it.

Atwar would definatly need to do something about the servers before this happens.

作者： Mister Mister, 22.07.2016 at 14:13

Atwar would definatly need to do something about the servers before this happens.

The sever is alright we need more

作者： Htin, 22.07.2016 at 17:56

作者： Mister Mister, 22.07.2016 at 14:13

Atwar would definatly need to do something about the servers before this happens.

The sever is alright we need more

We don't need 30 player maximum games, before we even go into bringing that up we need more players in general. When you can't even fill up a 6 player game(excluding 3v3s) in atwar nowadays then you know there's an issue.