Testing and results of new nerfed Blitzkrieg

Me and opi just tested how nerfed Blitzkrieg works against other strategies. You can see results below.

---

• 4 Helicopters kill stack of 21 Blitz militia


• 9 helicopters kill stack of 50 Blitz militia

---

• 45 infs kill stack of 94 Blitz militia

---

• 58 infs kill stack of 105 Blitz militia

---

Relentless Attack (RA)

• 10 tanks kill stack of 40 Blitz militia

---

I hope you are satisfied now, you just killed one strategy with your cry.
PS. that is not wish of most of players, that is wish of 15 players.

gg

i see fair battles againist blitz range and attack

Looks good to me

Give Us Blitz Back

Support

gg

Woah

What about nc destroyers O.o

作者： Zeeroo, 25.04.2015 at 14:46

What about nc destroyers O.o

We will add that in 15 minutes.

作者： Mr_Own_U, 25.04.2015 at 14:42

Looks good to me

We need old blitz back

Cry some more how a long ranged cheap defensive unit is nerfed in a completely offensive strategy.

Do you use Helicopters with SM?
Do you use Bombers with DS?
Do you use Marines with RA?

No? ...SO WHY THE FUCK IS IT STRANGE NOT TO USE A SECONDARY DEFENSE UNIT WITH A FUCKIN UBERATTACK STRATEGY?

作者： Croat, 25.04.2015 at 14:47

作者： Zeeroo, 25.04.2015 at 14:46

What about nc destroyers O.o

We will add that in 15 minutes.

sm bomber too

Thank you for running and posting these tests Croat. Having these objective measures makes it even more obvious that the nerf was necessary and good for gameplay.

This is sad, you changed a weak strat because you coudn't find a way to beat ukraine, this game isn't all about fucking ukr vs turkey, these changes have consecuences for all the other people that plays this game, i do believe this is our fault for not stopping these 15+ people , but what makes blitz defense OP in ukr and only in ukr is general, with its +1 hp for militia, +1 defense for infantry etc ect

EDIT: you guys abuse of the fact that noone else besides you gives its opinion, too much selfishness

作者： Acquiesce, 25.04.2015 at 14:56

Thank you for running and posting these tests Croat. Having these objective measures makes it even more obvious that the nerf was necessary and good for gameplay.

axaxaxa go acqui!

Also note that the people who support this topic and thumb it up are the ones who use blitz primarily.

作者： Acquiesce, 25.04.2015 at 14:56

Thank you for running and posting these tests Croat. Having these objective measures makes it even more obvious that the nerf was necessary and good for gameplay.

Necessary so you dont cry anymore with your PD Turks

作者： Acquiesce, 25.04.2015 at 14:56

Thank you for running and posting these tests Croat. Having these objective measures makes it even more obvious that the nerf was necessary and good for gameplay.

plz ask whatever you are uncomfortable with in my thread, i will answer everything

作者： Mr_Own_U, 25.04.2015 at 14:57

作者： Acquiesce, 25.04.2015 at 14:56

Thank you for running and posting these tests Croat. Having these objective measures makes it even more obvious that the nerf was necessary and good for gameplay.

axaxaxa go acqui!

Also note that the people who support this topic and thumb it up are the ones who use blitz primarily.

check out my own thread, and ask w/e you want there, i will answer and PROVE anything

作者： Zeeroo, 25.04.2015 at 14:57

This is sad, you changed a weak strat because you coudn't find a way to beat ukraine, this game isn't all about fucking ukr vs turkey, these changes have consecuences for all the other people that plays this game, i do believe this is our fault for not stopping these 15+ people , but what makes blitz defense OP in ukr and only in ukr is general, with its +1 hp for militia, +1 defense for infantry etc ect

Objectively said

作者： Zeeroo, 25.04.2015 at 14:57

This is sad, you changed a weak strat because you coudn't find a way to beat ukraine, this game isn't all about fucking ukr vs turkey, these changes have consecuences for all the other people that plays this game, i do believe this is our fault for not stopping these 15+ people , but what makes blitz defense OP in ukr and only in ukr is general, with its +1 hp for militia, +1 defense for infantry etc ect

absolutely agree with you

作者： Abraham, 25.04.2015 at 15:02

作者： Zeeroo, 25.04.2015 at 14:57

This is sad, you changed a weak strat because you coudn't find a way to beat ukraine, this game isn't all about fucking ukr vs turkey, these changes have consecuences for all the other people that plays this game, i do believe this is our fault for not stopping these 15+ people , but what makes blitz defense OP in ukr and only in ukr is general, with its +1 hp for militia, +1 defense for infantry etc ect

absolutely agree with you

I see you deleted your why are PD infantry so strong in attack vs militia ...guess you realized neutral militia is not PD militia.
Most of my strategy playing in the last year and a half has been blitz ...and you don't see me complaining.

You don't see me complaining that i got -2 on a unit that mostly in the game i get FOR FREE by taking cities and you don't see me panicking like suddenly blitzkrieg is useless ...because i played that shit with even worse nerf and as long as you play it like it is intended as an attack strategy this is nothing.

Old players made guides how to play blitz, how to use walls, expaned, retreat and attack again ...what has blitz become after the boost? Attack, rush, attack, win.

作者： Acquiesce, 25.04.2015 at 14:56

Thank you for running and posting these tests Croat. Having these objective measures makes it even more obvious that the nerf was necessary and good for gameplay.

Support

The vocal minority wins again, while the silent majority just shakes its head in disapproval.

作者： Acquiesce, 25.04.2015 at 14:56

Thank you for running and posting these tests Croat. Having these objective measures makes it even more obvious that the nerf was necessary and good for gameplay.

作者： Goblin, 25.04.2015 at 15:05

I see you deleted your why are PD infantry so strong in attack vs militia ...guess you realized neutral militia is not PD militia.
Most of my strategy playing in the last year and a half has been blitz ...and you don't see me complaining.

You don't see me complaining that i got -2 on a unit that mostly in the game i get FOR FREE by taking cities and you don't see me panicking like suddenly blitzkrieg is useless ...because i played that shit with even worse nerf and as long as you play it like it is intended as an attack strategy this is nothing.

Old players made guides how to play blitz, how to use walls, expaned, retreat and attack again ...what has blitz become after the boost? Attack, rush, attack, win.

Well put

The best part is that they nerfed blitzkrieg because some "competitive" players complains about not being able to beat Blitz ukraine...

Now, the only person to blame here is exactly the man who pushed this change: Laochra.

But nothing we can do, I guess if Ivan approved it even though we stated our opinion in that thread, is because he either didn't read it, or he only trust Laochra for this kind of Issues. I dunno he would nerf a strategy based in a so specific combo.

作者： clovis1122, 25.04.2015 at 15:42

The best part is that they nerfed blitzkrieg because some "competitive" players complains about not being able to beat Blitz ukraine...

Now, the only person to blame here is exactly the man who pushed this change: Laochra.

But nothing we can do, I guess if Ivan approved it even though we stated our opinion in that thread, is because he either didn't read it, or he only trust Laochra for this kind of Issues. I dunno he would nerf a strategy based on a so specific combo.

i answered laochra's arguments in my thread, which were very well described and proved, no idea why i don't see any more blitz haters in my thread, they keep bullying croat

作者： Tundy, 25.04.2015 at 15:11

The vocal minority wins again, while the silent majority just shakes its head in disapproval.

>2900 posts

> silent

作者： clovis1122, 25.04.2015 at 15:42

clovis starting to post