This is AW's top season clan

Shadow Aces came from page 2 of clans to #2 in total clan ranking and #1 in season ranking. Its pretty nice how they did it no doubt.

But as it happend with many clans, when they reached #1 they stopped cwing and refuse every cw. Now this is not an offensive post torwards SA players but to some of them.

After pr el crey about 5-6 times today for cw (he didnt reply ofc) , he sends me this :




I belive dino posted something about changing this thing , but not by removing hard earned elos. Anyone has any suggestion how can we stop this thing? Like most of seasons all #1 clans stop cwing. Its not like you deserve #1 if you stop cwing like a ()cat.

Again, dont turn this into flame war because this is not offensive post to SA, but even if they get #1 medal, it would be totally unfair.

You cant change this, they have unfortunately every right not to play cw's. They have done it in the past, and they will continue doing it in the future.

Cool, i remember you being in SA but that didnt last long, especialy since you were the reason they were a second page clan.

Go go go Shadow Aces!!

作者： ShaiBB, 07.08.2015 at 18:48

Cool, i remember you being in SA but that didnt last long, especialy since you were the reason they were a second page clan.

well if you talk from your ass you gonna make comments like these ^

again i wasnt trying to make flame war or making hate thread against SA. And when i joined SA they were in #1 page and i cwed for them alot, unlike you who give your account to skenderbeu for cws

Yup, we could use a kind of limiter in this way, just to keep the activity. Maybe "You need minimum 5 CW's in 15 days to be in the scoreboard (seems reasonable for me, others may differ).

作者： clovis1122, 07.08.2015 at 19:54

Yup, we could use a kind of limiter in this way, just to keep the activity. Maybe "You need minimum 5 CW's in 15 days to be in the scoreboard (seems reasonable for me, others may differ).

or at least 1-2 cw / week. if not then -10 or -15 elo

作者： AlBoZzZ, 07.08.2015 at 20:02

作者： clovis1122, 07.08.2015 at 19:54

Yup, we could use a kind of limiter in this way, just to keep the activity. Maybe "You need minimum 5 CW's in 15 days to be in the scoreboard (seems reasonable for me, others may differ).

or at least 1-2 cw / week. if not then -10 or -15 elo

cri

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:10

作者： AlBoZzZ, 07.08.2015 at 20:02

作者： clovis1122, 07.08.2015 at 19:54

Yup, we could use a kind of limiter in this way, just to keep the activity. Maybe "You need minimum 5 CW's in 15 days to be in the scoreboard (seems reasonable for me, others may differ).

or at least 1-2 cw / week. if not then -10 or -15 elo

cri

cri deez nutz

Id like for them to take all first medals from all seasons because i was proposing some changes about that and no one cared.
It was:
3 cws in a week minimum.
If someone doesnt cw 3 times in a week he loses elo points of last 3 cws.

作者： AlBoZzZ, 08.08.2015 at 02:14

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:10

作者： AlBoZzZ, 07.08.2015 at 20:02

作者： clovis1122, 07.08.2015 at 19:54

Yup, we could use a kind of limiter in this way, just to keep the activity. Maybe "You need minimum 5 CW's in 15 days to be in the scoreboard (seems reasonable for me, others may differ).

or at least 1-2 cw / week. if not then -10 or -15 elo

cri

cri deez nutz

u cri

作者： Kromn, 08.08.2015 at 02:18

Id like for them to take all first medals from all seasons because i was proposing some changes about that and no one cared.
It was:
3 cws in a week minimum.
If someone doesnt cw 3 times in a week he loses elo points of last 3 cws.

u too cri

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:28

作者： AlBoZzZ, 08.08.2015 at 02:14

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:10

作者： AlBoZzZ, 07.08.2015 at 20:02

作者： clovis1122, 07.08.2015 at 19:54

Yup, we could use a kind of limiter in this way, just to keep the activity. Maybe "You need minimum 5 CW's in 15 days to be in the scoreboard (seems reasonable for me, others may differ).

or at least 1-2 cw / week. if not then -10 or -15 elo

cri

cri deez nutz

u cri

cri more deez nutz

作者： AlBoZzZ, 08.08.2015 at 02:34

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:28

作者： AlBoZzZ, 08.08.2015 at 02:14

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:10

作者： AlBoZzZ, 07.08.2015 at 20:02

作者： clovis1122, 07.08.2015 at 19:54

Yup, we could use a kind of limiter in this way, just to keep the activity. Maybe "You need minimum 5 CW's in 15 days to be in the scoreboard (seems reasonable for me, others may differ).

or at least 1-2 cw / week. if not then -10 or -15 elo

cri

cri deez nutz

u cri

cri more deez nutz

u cri more

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:29

作者： Kromn, 08.08.2015 at 02:18

Id like for them to take all first medals from all seasons because i was proposing some changes about that and no one cared.
It was:
3 cws in a week minimum.
If someone doesnt cw 3 times in a week he loses elo points of last 3 cws.

u too cri

why would i,when i was leader with mantis and crypt in BoB we was second that season,you was third,no cwing killed your first place that season,will kill again.

作者： Kromn, 08.08.2015 at 02:37

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:29

作者： Kromn, 08.08.2015 at 02:18

Id like for them to take all first medals from all seasons because i was proposing some changes about that and no one cared.
It was:
3 cws in a week minimum.
If someone doesnt cw 3 times in a week he loses elo points of last 3 cws.

u too cri

why would i,when i was leader with mantis and crypt in BoB we was second that season,you was third,no cwing killed your first place that season,will kill again.

okay, i didn't understand a word of that
but cri more

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:39

作者： Kromn, 08.08.2015 at 02:37

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:29

作者： Kromn, 08.08.2015 at 02:18

Id like for them to take all first medals from all seasons because i was proposing some changes about that and no one cared.
It was:
3 cws in a week minimum.
If someone doesnt cw 3 times in a week he loses elo points of last 3 cws.

u too cri

why would i,when i was leader with mantis and crypt in BoB we was second that season,you was third,no cwing killed your first place that season,will kill again.

okay, i didn't understand a word of that
but cri more

we know that you are brainless and dont understand anything,dont need to tell it xD

作者： Kromn, 08.08.2015 at 02:41

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:39

作者： Kromn, 08.08.2015 at 02:37

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:29

作者： Kromn, 08.08.2015 at 02:18

Id like for them to take all first medals from all seasons because i was proposing some changes about that and no one cared.
It was:
3 cws in a week minimum.
If someone doesnt cw 3 times in a week he loses elo points of last 3 cws.

u too cri

why would i,when i was leader with mantis and crypt in BoB we was second that season,you was third,no cwing killed your first place that season,will kill again.

okay, i didn't understand a word of that
but cri more

we know that you are brainless and dont understand nothing,dont need to tell it xD

*the brainless person*, *don't understand anything*, *not - xD but - *so aw community will think of u as a badass and cool guy*

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:43

*the brainless person*, *don't understand anything*, *not - xD but - *so aw community will think that u are badass and cool guy*

*so aw community will think that you are idiot*

作者： Kromn, 08.08.2015 at 02:44

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:43

*the brainless person*, *don't understand anything*, *not - xD but - *so aw community will think that u are badass and cool guy*

*so aw community will think that you are idiot*

*an idiot*
stop flaming this thread with ur insults ok ? this thread is very important for some guys, and nobody needs ur insults and trollings

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:47

作者： Kromn, 08.08.2015 at 02:44

作者： Guest, 08.08.2015 at 02:43

*the brainless person*, *don't understand anything*, *not - xD but - *so aw community will think that u are badass and cool guy*

*so aw community will think that you are idiot*

*an idiot*
stop flaming this thread with ur insults ok ? this thread is very important for some guys, and nobody needs ur insults and trollings

you started first xD

Minimum cws per week wont work, all you have to do is play vs bad clans. Anyway stop complaining, SA have beaten all the top clans. Its our own faults for losing to them. If a clan is skipping ahead of all the others on elo take the cw seriously. My only issue is that they stopped cwing so early but whatever.

Anyway its fine, theyre not unreachable. Theyll be forced to play one of us shortly. The elo pool is large enough for another clan to pass them even if they dont cw.

Lol this how cowards do anyway time to farm evol

I don't cw for elo, or a 1st place trophy, I cw for the fun of compition against aws best, and the glory of all those who watch and admire those competing during those cws that's why I do it. With that being said the current system is indeed broken and it forces leaders to make tough decisions such as, A) do we cw those with signifigant lower elo for the sake of our honor, or B) Play it smart to hold supremacy. Every season the top clan chooses the later, just saying. Even I wish the system forces us to cw, but it don't. So a smart clan wont.

Shadow aces op

作者： AlBoZzZ, 07.08.2015 at 20:02

作者： clovis1122, 07.08.2015 at 19:54

Yup, we could use a kind of limiter in this way, just to keep the activity. Maybe "You need minimum 5 CW's in 15 days to be in the scoreboard (seems reasonable for me, others may differ).

or at least 1-2 cw / week. if not then -10 or -15 elo

I made a suggestion about this in dinoscout's thread:

作者： Waffel, 02.08.2015 at 16:44

How about this:

Divide the amount of played clanwars throughout the whole week by 5/4/3 to get to a minimum amount of clanwars that has to be played in the next week.
In order to control the activity of a clan, we could use the idea that dinoscout suggested.
So if a clan doesn't play the minimum amount of clanwars that was based on the amount of played clanwars throughout the week before, we could like take away elo of them.

In order to calculate how much elo it would be, I suggest to do the same how to calculate the amount of minimum clanwars that should be played in the next week, so dividing the amount of elo earned by the clan in the week before by 5/4/3 to get to see how much elo the clan will lose.

Now you guys will probably think ''If they lose their divided elo once, it still wouldn't really punish the clans for the other weeks''.
We could keep on dividing the total earned elo by that clan in the last week they played a cw in.

So for example:
Clan A earned 150 elo in week 1. They did not cw for 2 weeks after week 1.
In week 2 they lose: 150 divided by 5/4/3 elo. So they would lose 30 elo if divided by 5, 37,5 elo if divided by 4, and 50 elo if divided by 3.
So if it got divided by 3, the amount of elo in week 3 is a total of 100 elo. In order to calculate the amount of elo that should be taken away for week 3 we simply have to divide the current amount of elo that is left after the amount of elo in week 2 have been taken away by 5/4/3. This way the amount of elo taken away is getting bigger every week and kinda avoids clans to be in #1 and just stop cwing to remain #1.

The amounts of elo that will be taken away sounds really much in the example above, but you gotta realise, almost any ACTIVE (ofcourse this elo taken away should only count for the clans that were active with clanwars during the season) plays atleast 1 or 2 cw's a week. So the amount of minimum clanwars that should been played for the next week arent that shocking compared with the current clanwar activity in this game.

----

If people want me to make a different thread about this one so we can maybe add some things in to the suggestion (if the community likes the idea) PM me.

I'm just here to watch the flame war.

作者： theFuehrer, 11.08.2015 at 09:59

I'm just here to watch the flame war.

then u r a very naughty boy

Starts off a great post then shit hits the fan, then back to the great post! GJ atWar

Other clans get elo to surpass them and make it viable for a cw risk/reward then it can happen.
Please though, minimun amount of cws to be played to be on scoreboard