Barbesssa 账户已删除 |
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
MoS all the way, baby.
----
~Somewhere in the distance an eagle shrieked as it rode an American buffalo to an apple-pie-eating contest at a baseball field.~
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
DS cuz strong OP in some cases
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
DS.PD.NC. samethimes none strategy
----
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
PD, GW and MoS.
----
~Somewhere in the distance an eagle shrieked as it rode an American buffalo to an apple-pie-eating contest at a baseball field.~
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Lucky Bastard
Blitz
Desert Storm
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
作者: Tundy, 10.08.2012 at 20:02
Lucky Bastard
Blitz
Desert Storm
Is LB even that good?
----
~Somewhere in the distance an eagle shrieked as it rode an American buffalo to an apple-pie-eating contest at a baseball field.~
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Yes, is the best strategy
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
I use GC mostly but have begun to question it after the atWar upgrade, you gain 1, but lose three. Every time i look at that it makes me wince.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
IF, SM, Imp!
----
The funny thing about this is by the time you realize that this is completely pointless, it's too late to stop reading.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
I do say mate Imp does save the cost of the units, but I do enjoy Blitz too for rapid speed/advances on land/Sea.
----
"I Don't Know What Just Went Wrong"-Derpy Hooves
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
MoS, NC, GW and RA, in that order.
MoS unless there are no stealth units and/or lots of water and/or poor countries.
NC if there is a lot of water (Eben, Lost Sea, Greek World, etc.).
GW if the map is poor (and has stealth units). However, if there is a lot of water, the slow and expensive transports make me default to NC.
RA - if you don't know what else to do, it's hard to go wrong with RA.
IF is great until you realize how crippling -2 range is for all units - militia can't even move without transportation (for modern tech maps and several fantasy maps, as well).
HW looks really dumb...more harm than good....
I rely on infantry too much for GC to be a good strat for me. I think it has potential, but the -3 attack for infantry, plus the -3 defense for tanks, really polarizes the usefulness of the units. I have not found the potential I assume is there.
Never used DS...heard that it is a recommended strat for Free Peoples of Middle Earth...I'll have to try that sometime...
LB is expensive, but it has its advantages...only ever used it once...I find that longer ranges and cheaper prices are the best sort of enhancements when choosing strats...LB doesn't make anything faster, and it raises the costs of everything.
I've used PD once, for the Helm's Deep scenario as the Elves. Works well there, otherwise, it's pointless. AtWar maps reward expansion and conquering. You are not doing much of that with PD...or Imp, for that matter.
Blitz has its advantages, but the only way anybody can beat me with that is if they really get a good hold of nearby territories. Otherwise, they just over-extend themselves and die quickly from the -1 defense.
SM looks like fun, but it is the most susceptible to other units (AA guns, +1 defense bonus for destroyers and subs). Maybe once I get Air Transport II and Cheap Transportation, I'll unlock SM...
----
Embrace the void
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Imperialist: Beast strategy
----
Hi
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Lucky Bas and Iron Fist are what I used, if I use any, I use None as well. These are what I like because they are the 2 Strategies I have that are for ALL units.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
Death1812 账户已删除 |
Tank General
Rentless attack
载入中...
载入中...
|
RaYan S.K 账户已删除 |
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Everytime I see the initials, I immediately think Space Marine, Imperial Fist, Planetary Defense too much time on dakkadakka.
Anyways, I usually go with Naval Commander, Imperialist, and Lucky Bastard. I usually win with Imp and LB, but NC is more of a 50/50 thing, which kinda sucks, since that's definitely my favorite.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Lucky Bastard All the way!
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
IF, SM, Imp!
omg agree, only imp = gw, and sm = MoS
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Still toying with them and haven't tried them all. Would say I have found DS to work really well for me on the world map. Like MoS need to practice it more. RA and PD I feel confident with as well. But so far DS seems to suit my play style well. Didn't see it on the poll, so I didn't vote.
----
"The edge is never very far away, when you're hanging on by your fingernails." ©
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Love NC but i am forced to play PD
----
Humans are only a suicidal sub species of Chimps running a muck on this planet.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
I'm surprised that Guerrilla Warfare isn't higher up, and more surprised about Imperialist. I guess times have changed, but I know what hasn't changed: Perfect Defense is still the most popular.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
None. i like to play as an all rounder
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Naval has always been my go to for the way I like to play, destroyer stats are cray cray, but looking to find ways to tweak my strategy for better land tactics.. any advice would be appreciated
----
Woof
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
作者: Htin, 28.05.2014 at 15:43
Imperialist: Beast strategy
Hi
----
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
作者: Htin, 28.05.2014 at 15:43
Imperialist: Beast strategy
----
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Naval Commander is insanely flexible, Perfect Defense works just about anywhere, and Lucky Bastard is my go-to if I'm playing a moderate starting cash country like Spain, Poland, or Italy.
载入中...
载入中...
|