|
作者: Waffel, 21.02.2016 at 08:35
作者: Waffel, 21.12.2015 at 10:06
@Clovis in this thread xaxa
"inverse rankism" lol.
> makes guides on europe+
> tries to convince us he knows what hes talking about when it comes to the metagame.
> thinks hes the king of adapting and map/setting diversity.
> makes thread asking for italy expansions after playing eu for 4 years
> rank 12
> 4 years
> rank 12
> 4 years!
> rank 12
LOL REPPED
Thnx, you're welcome.
Nice spam
----
Our next Moments are Tomorrows Memories
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
I'd like to change my stance.
I think that atWar should'be more random.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
I'd like to change my stance.
I think that atWar should'be more random.
Boy I love me some randomness
----
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
作者: ROYAL, 26.03.2016 at 23:47
I'd like to change my stance.
I think that atWar should'be more random.
Boy I love me some randomness
I'll promise you that if you repeat that battle with exact units a couple of times you'll realize what I mean.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
作者: ROYAL, 26.03.2016 at 23:47
I'd like to change my stance.
I think that atWar should'be more random.
Boy I love me some randomness
I'll promise you that if you repeat that battle with exact units a couple of times you'll realize what I mean.
the problem is, that amoks battlecode sucks, this too armies fight for their own and not together. So they havnt any stackbonus.
and i support this "Maybe just cut out tbs with a <20% chance of success"
----
"War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means."
― Carl von Clausewitz
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
I'd like to change my stance.
I think that atWar should'be more random.
lol from what you said to me you want less random variance in results. So you actually want aw to be less random. But because you don't know how to english properly yet, you just stated the exact opposite of what you want and confused a lot of people.
----
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|