19.06.2014 - 11:53
+1 Attack to all units. +30 cost to all units. -1 range for Infantry. +1 range to tanks. Edited.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
19.06.2014 - 12:27
your nerfs far outweight the boosts. maintenace is 10% of total unit cost so by adding +40 cost youre adding +4 maint. i wouldnt use this strat, tunders right its practically ra
----
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
19.06.2014 - 12:40
What about a strategy that's similar in concept to imperialist but just the opposite? Imperialist reduces the cost of all units whilst nerfing their attacks to compensate for the buff. So something like +50 cost to all units but +(3 or 5) to attack/defence to all units where the cost is increased to all units whilst buffing their attacks, defence, or both to compensate for the nerf. Make it ridiculously expensive, but make the units bought strong enough. Wondering how that might affect players playing smaller countries to save enough money to spawn overpowered, but few units. This is not something that I've completely thought through though. Just poking at the idea.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
19.06.2014 - 12:59
+1 HP + 30 cost to all units?
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
19.06.2014 - 13:11
That's exactly the idea that I had. Except I thought +1 attack and +30 cost would be too OP.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
19.06.2014 - 14:52
The concept of it is LB to an extent. LB is too weak tho.
---- We are not the same - I am a Martian. We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
21.06.2014 - 06:18
Wow, guys. It was just an open thought, no need to be so demanding :'( I do think it would be an interesting strategy if there is any way in balancing it.
载入中...
载入中...
|
你确定吗?