获得高级隐藏所有广告
发表: 15   谁浏览过: 73 users

投票

Many "Rogue" inside "Role Players Map". We need this option game!

Yeah, it's very important option for RP
19
Yes, it's good to have it for any game
9
No, it's useless (really?)
18

投票总数: 45
18.05.2016 - 18:21
Thank you to let your opinion also
----
열흘 붉은 꽃이 없다 !
载入中...
载入中...
18.05.2016 - 18:28
WE need an option for sure !
载入中...
载入中...
18.05.2016 - 18:38
Yes I think so. i'm tired to repeat everytimes same things to players to dont attack (until turn 4) for RP ....
----
열흘 붉은 꽃이 없다 !
载入中...
载入中...
18.05.2016 - 18:54
I have no idea what this is about but my vote still counts!!!
载入中...
载入中...
18.05.2016 - 18:59
Lollz turn 2 for all games it shud be
DELETE RP
----
USA USA USA
载入中...
载入中...
19.05.2016 - 04:41
Usually we can attack turn 2 any players, it's why we can still have option to use turn 2 for others maps and not rp. It's why I say turn 2 (for normal game) and more turn for RP and MapMakers. MapMakers make many efforts to have new maps to enjoy our community but it's could be ruined the game if players rogue and don't respect the rules of the map. It happening often...
----
열흘 붉은 꽃이 없다 !
载入中...
载入中...
19.05.2016 - 04:46
njab
账户已删除
I don't see "Rimuv RP" option here. Shit poll.
载入中...
载入中...
19.05.2016 - 04:46
Yes Rogues just destroy the Environemt of RP
载入中...
载入中...
19.05.2016 - 04:51
作者: Guest, 19.05.2016 at 04:46

I don't see "Rimuv RP" option here. Shit poll.


Njab, this poll is for RP players and mapmakers.
If you dont want play RP, just ignore this poll ;-)
----
열흘 붉은 꽃이 없다 !
载入中...
载入中...
19.05.2016 - 04:52
作者: your_PROUD, 19.05.2016 at 04:46

Yes Rogues just destroy the Environemt of RP


Exactly and can destroy also the pleasure to play a good RP map.
----
열흘 붉은 꽃이 없다 !
载入中...
载入中...
19.05.2016 - 08:09
Em..... it certainly is not a priority but you could have it as an option for map makers.
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

载入中...
载入中...
19.05.2016 - 08:51
The 'Yes' option is going to win, because of the sheer number of RP fa- players on this game.

Voted 'No', although this poll really needs a 'Hell Naw!' option.

作者: RaulPB, 19.05.2016 at 08:09

Em..... it certainly is not a priority but you could have it as an option for map makers.

Having it as an option for custom map-makers, is AW speak for: 'Its useless, and a lot of people don't want it, but we're too fed-up to argue about it, so let's compromise'
----


载入中...
载入中...
19.05.2016 - 08:59
Lol NO NO NO
载入中...
载入中...
19.05.2016 - 09:22
作者: Darth., 19.05.2016 at 08:51

Having it as an option for custom map-makers, is AW speak for: 'Its useless, and a lot of people don't want it, but we're too fed-up to argue about it, so let's compromise'

Well.... kinda...

I simply don't want to argue about this which has already been sugggested before. If you say yes, you're admitting it's useful, which it doesn't really is; and if you say no, RP fa - players will think you're a RP hater and a bad person because there's no reason whatsoever for not having such feature as an option since it would not harm us in any way directly, which also is a bit untrue since that would enable lots of narb map makers to make "no war maps"...
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

载入中...
载入中...
20.05.2016 - 12:25
Only way I see this being useful would be so Russia and Japan don't attack each other right away in ww2
----
载入中...
载入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隐私条例 | 服务条例 | 横额 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我们在

将游戏传播出去!