获得高级隐藏所有广告
发表: 6   谁浏览过: 38 users
10.01.2013 - 13:56
Why isn't there an upgrade for reducing destroyer cost by 10? There is one for marines, for infantry transports and sentries, but NC isn't a popular strat and without any upgrades for it it wouldn't be likely to become a popular strat in the future
----

[pr] Commando Eagle: duel?
[pr] Commando Eagle: i have to regain back the lost elos and gain extra as punishment for rush



载入中...
载入中...
11.01.2013 - 07:31
Good idea.
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
载入中...
载入中...
11.01.2013 - 07:38
Good idea !
----
.10.

atWar Radio<3


play for fun, just for fun.
载入中...
载入中...
11.01.2013 - 08:09
Support
----
Exceptional claims demand exceptional evidence.
载入中...
载入中...
11.01.2013 - 08:36
NC destroyers are too cheap and there are enough upgrades out there. IRL a destroyer costs so much only USA, China, Russia and UK can spam a few of them. What they do lack is firepower. Destroyers should have NC attack always, keeping their cost high. One could also add +1 defence (but not +2 as in NC).

Naval Commander needs to have reduced cost for marines. This improves attacking chances on land especially when invading distant overseas lands. That is the whole idea of a strong naval force.

*Did you know marines are also known as naval infantry?*

I also have wondered why destroyers aren't able to carry marine units. I guess it is too late development-wise for this consideration.
----
hue
载入中...
载入中...
11.01.2013 - 10:23
I agree with ZOG. Also modern ships are used to launch cruise missiles against ground targets, so its not like they're not used irl. 11 attack would do nicely.
载入中...
载入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隐私条例 | 服务条例 | 横额 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我们在

将游戏传播出去!