[Profile] Show Win:Lose ratio/percentage

Profile page-Information section needs to account percentage/ratio of our respective win:lose stats. As the majority or which as I assume tends to evaluate--people.

Player performance is reflected on the aforementioned strata right? Include the games abandoned percentage on the info section as well.

Whaddya say?

Hm... well... you can already see the amount of games you've played and the ones you won... isn't that all you need?

作者： RaulPB, 01.05.2015 at 14:30

Hm... well... you can already see the amount of games you've played and the ones you won... isn't that all you need?

Idk, helps us be more lazy, so we don't have to do math. I support laziness ....
Ahahahaaa

作者： Google, 01.05.2015 at 16:05

作者： RaulPB, 01.05.2015 at 14:30

Hm... well... you can already see the amount of games you've played and the ones you won... isn't that all you need?

Idk, helps us be more lazy, so we don't have to do math. I support laziness ....
Ahahahaaa

This. Hahaha

10:5 yay

For obvious reasons, you're more likely to win 3v3 games than you are to win 6 player free-for-alls.

Win-loss ratio is not a decent indicator of player capabilities.

作者： International, 02.05.2015 at 10:59

For obvious reasons, you're more likely to win 3v3 games than you are to win 6 player free-for-alls.

Win-loss ratio is not a decent indicator of player capabilities.

Not completely true. Even if it's a team game, if you lose, that counts as a loss no matter what happens to the rest of your team.

作者： RaulPB, 02.05.2015 at 17:44

作者： International, 02.05.2015 at 10:59

For obvious reasons, you're more likely to win 3v3 games than you are to win 6 player free-for-alls.

Win-loss ratio is not a decent indicator of player capabilities.

Not completely true. Even if it's a team game, if you lose, that counts as a loss no matter what happens to the rest of your team.

You're still more likely to win that compared to a 6-player free-for-all. Any reasonably competent player can hold up a 20%~40% win ratio playing 3v3s. He'd be lucky to have a 10% playing large free-for-all scenarios.

作者： RaulPB, 01.05.2015 at 14:30

Hm... well... you can already see the amount of games you've played and the ones you won... isn't that all you need?

What if it directly shows in the profile? It would help not wasting time on getting the calculator.

Support!

作者： International, 02.05.2015 at 22:09

作者： RaulPB, 02.05.2015 at 17:44

作者： International, 02.05.2015 at 10:59

For obvious reasons, you're more likely to win 3v3 games than you are to win 6 player free-for-alls.

Win-loss ratio is not a decent indicator of player capabilities.

Not completely true. Even if it's a team game, if you lose, that counts as a loss no matter what happens to the rest of your team.

You're still more likely to win that compared to a 6-player free-for-all. Any reasonably competent player can hold up a 20%~40% win ratio playing 3v3s. He'd be lucky to have a 10% playing large free-for-all scenarios.

The level in 3v3 isn't the same as in ffa usually, but it would be nice to have some indicator of skill.
Maybe something a bit more complicated. Like win ratio divided by the number of player and a define value for the team game.

作者： International, 02.05.2015 at 22:09

You're still more likely to win that compared to a 6-player free-for-all. Any reasonably competent player can hold up a 20%~40% win ratio playing 3v3s. He'd be lucky to have a 10% playing large free-for-all scenarios.

This FFA scenarios usually end up in big ally endings... so yeah, it's not that hard either, just survive long enough to be asked by other 8 players for ally end.

作者： Flaming Spaz, 03.05.2015 at 02:12

What if it directly shows in the profile? It would help not wasting time on getting the calculator.

Support!

Oh come on, 900 games, 300 won games, do you need calculator for that??? you guys really need to check your basic maths.

There should be one without abbandoning games included!
Because most of the people have like above 50%.

作者： Laozi, 03.05.2015 at 04:53

-snip-

Why not just a simple formula?

Say, in each game, call n the total number of players and v the number of winning players.

If you lose the game, you receive zero points and your functional game count goes up by (v/n).

If you win the game, you receive (1 - v/n) points and your functional game count goes up by the same.

Then you just simply sum up the number of points, sum up the functional game count, divide one by the other and you get your win:loss ratio. That way, winning solo in a 20-player game counts for a heck of a lot more than ally ending with 19 players still standing. As it, by the way, should.

作者： RaulPB, 03.05.2015 at 05:02

-snip-

But you get my point. Some games have a higher proportion of winners than others.

作者： International, 03.05.2015 at 08:22

作者： Laozi, 03.05.2015 at 04:53

-snip-

Why not just a simple formula?

Say, in each game, call n the total number of players and v the number of winning players.

If you lose the game, you receive zero points and your functional game count goes up by (v/n).

If you win the game, you receive (1 - v/n) points and your functional game count goes up by the same.

Then you just simply sum up the number of points, sum up the functional game count, divide one by the other and you get your win:loss ratio. That way, winning solo in a 20-player game counts for a heck of a lot more than ally ending with 19 players still standing. As it, by the way, should.

Good idea

作者： International, 03.05.2015 at 08:23

-snip-

Ok then master, show us the mathematical way and let it be!

作者： RaulPB, 03.05.2015 at 09:07

作者： International, 03.05.2015 at 08:23

-snip-

Ok then master, show us the mathematical way and let it be!

That algorithm is understandable to anyone who took 6th grade math.

Okay, at least anyone who passed 6th grade math.

Seriously...

作者： International, 03.05.2015 at 09:12

That algorithm is understandable to anyone who took 6th grade math.

Okay, at least anyone who passed 6th grade math.

Seriously...

lol my joke would be understandable even to a 1st grade student
Yeah, seriously

Haha you need training when it comes to understand sarcasm, irony and humor

ANYWAY, support !!!

作者： RaulPB, 03.05.2015 at 10:10

作者： International, 03.05.2015 at 09:12

That algorithm is understandable to anyone who took 6th grade math.

Okay, at least anyone who passed 6th grade math.

Seriously...

lol my joke would be understandable even to a 1st grade student
Yeah, seriously

Haha you need training when it comes to understand sarcasm, irony and humor

ANYWAY, support !!!

I've been trained to type sixty words a minute, not bloody well understand jokes.

To each his own!

作者： International, 03.05.2015 at 10:41

I've been trained to type sixty words a minute, not bloody well understand jokes.

To each his own!

That's actually not so impressive having in mind that my mom can type 110-150 per minute

Get better at those fucking jokes, it might actually help you grow up and not be bullyed around

作者： RaulPB, 03.05.2015 at 10:51

作者： International, 03.05.2015 at 10:41

I've been trained to type sixty words a minute, not bloody well understand jokes.

To each his own!

That's actually not so impressive having in mind that my mom can type 150 per minute

Get better at those fucking jokes, it might actually help you grow up and not be bullyed around

150 words a minute on the cell? I'm impressed. I can barely make 150 on my laptop.

Also, me bullied? What is this joke?

I stay out of everybody's way, and they stay out of mine. Our school is very nice that way.

作者： International, 03.05.2015 at 10:52

150 words a minute on the cell? I'm impressed. I can barely make 150 on my laptop.

Also, me bullied? What is this joke?

I stay out of everybody's way, and they stay out of mine. Our school is very nice that way.

the heck? No, I meant computer! What else would it be?? Who competes in the cell?? Anyway I can beat you on the cell

The joke? Not a joke, just a suggestion to improve personal relationships by saying that you descibe your school as an autist hospital.

作者： RaulPB, 03.05.2015 at 05:02

作者： Flaming Spaz, 03.05.2015 at 02:12

What if it directly shows in the profile? It would help not wasting time on getting the calculator.

Support!

Oh come on, 900 games, 300 won games, do you need calculator for that??? you guys really need to check your basic maths.

What if it's 1537 won and 2333 played? It's just not subtraction. Takes time and so ya.

作者： e Mare, 03.05.2015 at 11:21

Neigh. Use Calculator.

I suck at math, thats why i use calculator but im too lazy to open a new tab.

作者： Flaming Spaz, 03.05.2015 at 11:34

What if it's 1537 won and 2333 played? It's just not subtraction. Takes time and so ya.

Just by looking at it I can aproximate it's close to 65%.

EDIT: OMFG, it's actually 65.88% by calculator I used no trick, simple quick calculation and approximation!

作者： RaulPB, 03.05.2015 at 12:40

作者： Flaming Spaz, 03.05.2015 at 11:34

What if it's 1537 won and 2333 played? It's just not subtraction. Takes time and so ya.

Just by looking at it I can aproximate it's close to 65%.

EDIT: OMFG, it's actually 65.88% by calculator I used no trick, simple quick calculation and approximation!

Close to? What if it's perfect? Would be good.

作者： Flaming Spaz, 03.05.2015 at 12:42

Close to? What if it's perfect? Would be good.

If you guys want such a posh addition, ok, fine. But I don't know what advantage gives you to know the perfectly exact percentage of won games XD

作者： RaulPB, 03.05.2015 at 12:45

作者： Flaming Spaz, 03.05.2015 at 12:42

Close to? What if it's perfect? Would be good.

If you guys want such a posh addition, ok, fine. But I don't know what advantage gives you to know the perfectly exact percentage of won games XD

Just looks good.

Yahoooo! I guess I am the first one to beat you in a debate. XD

作者： Flaming Spaz, 03.05.2015 at 12:56

Just looks good.

Yahoooo! I guess I am the first one to beat you in a debate. XD

You haven't beaten me and this is no debate I just quited from talking with a guy that doesn't know to calculate percentage by just looking at a couple of numbers, not worth the effort hahaha anyway, I guess the percentage thingy won't hurt anyone right??