|
This idea in my opinion would be an awesome idea for more medieval scenario's/maps. I think they should implement it as an option you can check off when starting the map/game. Personally I greatly support this idea, but have an idea on this topic. Reffering to Civilization's Revolution
In game the view of your land depends on the size of the city, which could relate back to AtWar, which would determine the range of the land based on the population, reinforcement number, and income of the city. Say Delphi with a reinforcement # of 8, a population of 14 mln, and an income of 214, would have a much greater range of view, than say Warsaw with 5 reinf., a population of 1.7 mln, and an income of 99. Basically if the fog option should be implemented into the game, I believe that their range should be determined by the basic size of the city.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Do you think that they'll finally think about adding the fog option though? It would be a fun thing to have...
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
But you could still see everything from the spectator point of view, if you have a buddy watching.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
I like the idea, would be cool on a map like Sapien.
----
[ img]Picture[/img]
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Admin should add this
----
Hi
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
This is gay.
----
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
This is gay.
Only a fan of un and rp would says ths and at-war is unrealistic
----
Hi
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
作者: Htin, 08.11.2014 at 10:15
This is gay.
Only a fan of un and rp would says ths and at-war is unrealistic
> fan of UN and RP. you don't know me then.
----
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
作者: Htin, 08.11.2014 at 10:15
This is gay.
Only a fan of un and rp would says ths and at-war is unrealistic
> fan of UN and RP. you don't know me then.
You even admitted it
----
Hi
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
No this is a stupid idea
you don't even play this game
----
Hi
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Good idea, support it may be an idea to have this option before the game starts, I will make sure admin see this.
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
I wish our dreams came true :s
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Support
----
Seule la victoire est belle
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
No Support
----
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Would make afterwind more realistic and worldgames more excited to play! even spectators can tell their 'friends' how many troops coming from the enemies.
Support this idea!
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Support
----
R.I.P. Mortal Kombat 2/15/2015
~Cryptic(CDN)
载入中...
载入中...
|
Soldier001 账户已删除 |
No support, this is a strategy game not a tactic one, no need to add fog.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
作者: Guest, 11.08.2015 at 08:08
No support, this strategy game not a tactic one, no need to add fog.
Think of the strategies you could use if your enemy couldn't see your armies coming. Show weakness in the north but come with a huge blow to the south. This would allow MORE strategy.
载入中...
载入中...
|
Soldier001 账户已删除 |
作者: Guest, 11.08.2015 at 08:08
No support, this strategy game not a tactic one, no need to add fog.
Think of the strategies you could use if your enemy couldn't see your armies coming. Show weakness in the north but come with a huge blow to the south. This would allow MORE strategy.
blitzkrieg was offensive doctrine not strategy, same goes for other so called "strats", it was general's mind that was using units different way, not something applying units that was giving them more power, and i think fow is bs, i mean every superior officer could've afforded a strategical map and pointed out enemies and his units there, as i said it's not tactical game where u launch close combat operations and u have no idea where ur enemy groups are hiding, this is strategy game, f.e 1 infantry = 1 infantry division which consists from ca. 13k men.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Support
----
"The essence of combat: kill, or be killed!"
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
载入中...
载入中...
|