09.04.2017 - 10:00
Baxaxa... haven't been participating on this.
Yesterday I made some tests to see how 'good' DS was after rushing Pretoria on T1... wasn't impressed. It is on a zone with <500 income and >50 reinfs. I went further and grouped up the usual countries that any Southern African's player would get earlier on, resulting in a total economy of 499 with 60 reinforcements (this is without counting upkeep, which would reduce it to ~120 income per turn). You can't even afford to use all your reinfs on DS militas. If the guy used "ocasional heli support" to attack khal... then he was actually Nerfing himself and throwing money away. Same thing I can't believe how khal let him ever get northern Africa. I'm not saying that khal is a bad player but perhaps he was left too damaged after Turn 5 to fight his DS counterpart. If that was the case, then it makes no sense to compare two strategies where one side already got the edge. GW Turkey may be bad, but if turkey get all of the balkans while Ukraine haven't got anything outside of his homecountry then obviously GW Turkey would have an advantage. The same history is true here. Hopefully you guys didn't assumed that khal imp would win just because the other guy's DS wasn't suitable for the map.
I believe you didn't addressed my point. I'm not concerned about DS being good on what it was made for. I don't mind DS being OP if the map layout or whatever factor your're speaking of flavors DS there. I would'be concerned if you achieve the same results on countries/zones or factors which aren't suitable for DS. But we've already agreed that DS is bad in germ/uk/ long range fights / poor economy areas so I don't know why you keep bringing up that point.
If DS truly outmatches the other strategies, then the results would'be reflected there. You would prove your point about DS being better than other strategies if it can achieve a higher success on fair battle conditions against other strategies. Is that simple.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
09.04.2017 - 10:35
K clovis, name a strat that has 130 cost 8 att (10 vs inf) 5 def and 11 range attack unit along with 5 def 30 cost defence unit.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Freeman 账户已删除 |
09.04.2017 - 14:03 Freeman 账户已删除
In the end, I agree with a minor nerf, let's say -1 range to mil and inf OR -1 range for mil and -1 att of helis vs inf/mil
载入中...
载入中...
|
09.04.2017 - 14:06
Such strategy doesn't exist as there's no attack bonus in this game.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Deleted User 278994 账户已删除 |
载入中...
载入中...
|
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Deleted User 278994 账户已删除 |
19.05.2017 - 11:49
I dont think therell be much whining on this one. Just the usual from waffel and clovis. And the likes of 4nic...
---- ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
Deleted User 150025 账户已删除 |
19.05.2017 - 11:56
DS needed nerf, so idk why you try to slander me.. ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
19.05.2017 - 11:58
I remember you arguing that it didn't need a nerf a bunch of times..
---- ''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies'' ~Napoleon ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
19.05.2017 - 11:59
Anyway if DS milita are like SM milita, you should also consider making DS infs like SM infs
---- ''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies'' ~Napoleon ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Deleted User 150025 账户已删除 |
19.05.2017 - 12:01
> Saying it didnt need a nerf bunch of times... ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
Deleted User 278994 账户已删除 |
19.05.2017 - 12:06
>slander Is this where we start seeing the fruits of that law degree?
---- ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
Deleted User 150025 账户已删除 |
19.05.2017 - 12:19
Stop trying to be funny, you are as funny as much free_warrior is normal. 0% ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
Deleted User 278994 账户已删除 |
19.05.2017 - 12:26
Wasnt slandering or trying to be funny. 0/2. Nice tryharding at being bitchey tho.
---- ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
Deleted User 278994 账户已删除 |
19.05.2017 - 12:48
They were once upon a time, but the admins nerfed it without any discussion due to complaints. They were reluctant to restore them which is why we went down the militia route. Anyways i am out of the strat change buisness, if someone else wants to go there then by all means go for it...
---- ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
20.05.2017 - 11:20
Shame. Now aqo and nic are gonna use it as an excuse when I beat hem the next time.... DS's niche will also get reduced. Though the strategy itself won't become useless. Was fun while it lasted.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
20.05.2017 - 22:34
well I for one do D All joking aside however, I think the new nerf has worked well thus far, but I do think that the helis are still quite OP. Let's not forget how crazy we all thought it was back when they gave helis that +1 defense (5 defense as it is now). That was enough to make DS a viable strategy. Then it got another attacking boost, and then the militia defense and range.. Did it make it useable as Germany, Turkey, and UK? Yes, and I have had loads of fun with it. But let's be real.. DS is op, and I would like it to go back to the way that it was back when it was just the 5 defense boost to helis, and militia had no range boost. People still used it, and it was viable as ukr, but it was a fair and even match that required skill to still win, and not just autistically moving around stacks from one place to another (to quote learster for all who remember). I guess what I'm saying is that the nerf is a positive step in the right direction, but going with WD's idea, or giving militia their normal move range I think would be the final touch to bring DS back to "normalcy" and #MakeAWGreatAgain
---- ![]() ![]() ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
20.05.2017 - 22:43
Woohoo i can now finally feel less guilty about ds ukr
---- ![]() ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
21.05.2017 - 01:00
Annnnd you just lost another duel turk vs ds ukr.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
21.05.2017 - 06:19
That would completely ruin the strategy.... Do you not think -2 defence to milita isnt dramatic? I have tested it and with the -2 i really cant utilize milita for defending anymore,the only thing you can do is use them for cheap expansion where their pd range gives them more options for taking neutrals and walling,i bet most people will argue about ds still being op after this nerf due to losing to it..its not the strat its the player.
---- ''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies'' ~Napoleon ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
21.05.2017 - 07:12
this will remove the edge of ds ukraine atacking everything and being able to withstand a rush at the same time , lets hope it works though ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
Deleted User 278994 账户已删除 |
21.05.2017 - 07:13
If you want to be real ds was pretty meh before the change. I personally only ever used it vs weaker opponents. Due to its' niche nature and lack of popularity people generally didn't know how to handle it. Go find a setting where it is now really difficult to beat in its current form. Then we will talk.
---- ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
21.05.2017 - 08:12
Not nerfed enough, needs more. No bonus vs militia i suppose should balance it.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
21.05.2017 - 10:41
quite true
---- ![]() ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
21.05.2017 - 12:05
Eh DS would lose a lot of usage if its bonus against mil was removed, it would only really be useful in very select circumstances. With mil bonus it has a generic expansion bonus, without it only has bonus against inf using strats and that's it, infed countries being negligible. Let's see how this nerf carries out and if anything more is needed I say it should be removing the defence buff to helis.
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
21.05.2017 - 13:03
Did you already managed to zoombug the wall which you said you would? Because I only lost that duel for you not respecting my 8 + 3 wall....
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
21.05.2017 - 14:04
well in 5k games its still quite strong (ireland, serbia etc.) all im saying is simply give it one more small nerf as I stated above, and I think it can still be useable, while not ridiculously strong. cw?
---- ![]() ![]() ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
21.05.2017 - 14:07
ur arguments are slightly biased mr.ionlyusedsnomatterwhat ![]() im not saying its op still due to me losing to it, quite frankly DS was beatable even when it was pre-nerf. All im saying is taking away just 1 attack from DS helis would probably bring the strategy back to normalcy. I mean lets be real.. i was GC and had a stack of 6inf and gen that lose to 3 helis... come one now, tell me that should be ok lol
---- ![]() ![]() ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
21.05.2017 - 14:43
that's what helis are supposed to do,kill infantry its the whole idea of it ![]()
---- ''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies'' ~Napoleon ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
|
21.05.2017 - 14:51
they were killing them fine previously... there was no need for that +1 on top of the +1 defense (since we all know heli's job is not to defend ![]() on another note.. did u even play aw before the famous ds boost? i dont think u have much credibility on this xd
---- ![]() ![]() ![]()
载入中...
载入中...
|
你确定吗?