获得高级隐藏所有广告
发表: 74   谁浏览过: 437 users

原发表

发表从 Cthulhu, 09.07.2015 - 22:23
Inspired by all the revolutions and rebellions that occur within the nations: The French revolution, American Revolution, the Russian revolution, The american civil war. They were primary regular citizen with little training. Hence the militia boost. They were also pretty good at maneuvering in their own homeland, hence to boost to sea transport and movement

Primary Boost:
Militia +1 attack, +4 Mov +10 Cost (I think it will be more competitive in the competitive scene if we remove the +10 Cost)
Sea Transport +1mov -100 Cost
+1 attack on INF (Laochra made a good point, and having this would make the strategy very strong on inception)

Nerfs:
+50 Cost to all Air
+20 Cost to tanks
-1 attack to Inf



20.02.2016 - 23:06
Why dont u give them some sticks and rocks to chuck at each other. and teach them to make canoes out of tree stumps.
载入中...
载入中...
21.02.2016 - 00:48
作者: Cthulhu, 20.02.2016 at 19:27

What do you guys think of the name Revolution? (Think napoleon's france)


What about Anarchic Delusions?


kidding
----
载入中...
载入中...
21.02.2016 - 01:21
50 cost isn't gonna stop anyone from using air units. GW has 750 for AT and 370 for sea trans and after t1/t2 it rarely stops it from using transports to get some good jews in. the 50 cost increase will only stop it from it's general expansion being too wide, but isn't enough to discourage anyone.

A strategy needs a real nerf to counteract the buff, but I don't see one here.
----

[pr] Commando Eagle: duel?
[pr] Commando Eagle: i have to regain back the lost elos and gain extra as punishment for rush



载入中...
载入中...
21.02.2016 - 07:10
Make it non premium strategy
载入中...
载入中...
21.02.2016 - 08:00
作者: Dbacks, 21.02.2016 at 01:21

50 cost isn't gonna stop anyone from using air units. GW has 750 for AT and 370 for sea trans and after t1/t2 it rarely stops it from using transports to get some good jews in. the 50 cost increase will only stop it from it's general expansion being too wide, but isn't enough to discourage anyone.

A strategy needs a real nerf to counteract the buff, but I don't see one here.


this.

120 cost transports with +1 movement, and op militia justified with +20 cost to tanks and +50 to at? also infantry with +1 attack and no nerfs? like seriously?
----
Another 6 a.m. start to the day just like all the rest
载入中...
载入中...
21.02.2016 - 14:04
作者: blautista, 21.02.2016 at 08:00

作者: Dbacks, 21.02.2016 at 01:21

50 cost isn't gonna stop anyone from using air units. GW has 750 for AT and 370 for sea trans and after t1/t2 it rarely stops it from using transports to get some good jews in. the 50 cost increase will only stop it from it's general expansion being too wide, but isn't enough to discourage anyone.

A strategy needs a real nerf to counteract the buff, but I don't see one here.


this.

120 cost transports with +1 movement, and op militia justified with +20 cost to tanks and +50 to at? also infantry with +1 attack and no nerfs? like seriously?

I would play this instead pd
----
No such thing as a good girl, you are just not the right guy.

载入中...
载入中...
22.02.2016 - 13:11
Ridiculously OP, as if we needed a "super GW" ...
----
Seule la victoire est belle
载入中...
载入中...
24.02.2016 - 12:53
This is to OP strat. Are you guys out of your mind .......
the nerfs are nothing in comparison.
----
载入中...
载入中...
24.02.2016 - 16:30
This strategy can be easily modified to make it less coup d'état and more human wave tactic type. Soviet World War 2 style. Nerf the attack and defence but provide lower starting cost, and provide for receiving higher starting reinforcements. Boost to heli and water trans, Nerf to bomber, ATs and destroyers. GW is stealthy quality through quantity. This'll be 'in your face' type quality-quantity.
----


载入中...
载入中...
25.02.2016 - 02:22
作者: Darth., 24.02.2016 at 16:30

This strategy can be easily modified to make it less coup d'état and more human wave tactic type. Soviet World War 2 style. Nerf the attack and defence but provide lower starting cost, and provide for receiving higher starting reinforcements. Boost to heli and water trans, Nerf to bomber, ATs and destroyers. GW is stealthy quality through quantity. This'll be 'in your face' type quality-quantity.


that's imp....
载入中...
载入中...
25.02.2016 - 04:42
Not exactly, though I see your point
----


载入中...
载入中...
25.02.2016 - 21:56
How about we increase cost for all non-militia units: +20 to ea. land units, +30 to ea. sea units, +40 to ea. air units, -1 gold upkeep to all non-militia units.

Then make militia units free with +2 atk, +1 def, +1 def in city/wall, +3 range, no upkeep.

Aced it. Simple. Rebels can barely afford expensive equipment that they need to rely on their accumulative manpower.
----
载入中...
载入中...
25.02.2016 - 22:01
作者: Yeomanry, 25.02.2016 at 21:56

How about we increase cost for all non-militia units: +20 to ea. land units, +30 to ea. sea units, +40 to ea. air units, -1 gold upkeep to all non-militia units.

Then make militia units free with +2 atk, +1 def, +1 def in city/wall, +3 range, no upkeep.

Aced it. Simple. Rebels can barely afford expensive equipment that they need to rely on their accumulative manpower.

Insanely overpowered
----





载入中...
载入中...
25.02.2016 - 22:59
作者: dinoscout, 25.02.2016 at 22:01

作者: Yeomanry, 25.02.2016 at 21:56

How about we increase cost for all non-militia units: +20 to ea. land units, +30 to ea. sea units, +40 to ea. air units, -1 gold upkeep to all non-militia units.

Then make militia units free with +2 atk, +1 def, +1 def in city/wall, +3 range, no upkeep.

Aced it. Simple. Rebels can barely afford expensive equipment that they need to rely on their accumulative manpower.

Insanely overpowered

you don't say haha... I think he was joking
----

[pr] Commando Eagle: duel?
[pr] Commando Eagle: i have to regain back the lost elos and gain extra as punishment for rush



载入中...
载入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隐私条例 | 服务条例 | 横额 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我们在

将游戏传播出去!