获得高级隐藏所有广告
发表: 81   谁浏览过: 192 users

原发表

发表从 GOD 2.0, 28.01.2013 - 09:59
There are strategys which affect the military and then there's my idea governments.

GOVERNMENTS:
are kinda like strategys but they affect countries or your economy
example:capitalism provides extra 5% income
another goverment can provide faster population growth or more reinforcements or able to detect stealth a little bit farther away from your citys and so on.

but also to make it balanced there can be disadvantages like the opposite of ^
and if u dont want a government then u can put none just like strategy
03.04.2013 - 16:56
As said nazi
----
载入中...
载入中...
04.04.2013 - 00:32
作者: Fruit, 01.04.2013 at 01:12


Democracy
Nah


Very good idea i support but propose samething for democrazy )))))))))))

Democrazy you got Bil Clinton or Bush(war criminals) for country president and going in big dept,units will got extra a/d if you atack Irag,Afghanistan,Vitnam,Yugoslavia. Uranium bombs huehuehueheu i jokes.

Democracy you got country president, cheaper stealth bomber, spy satellite ,atom bombs,missile, technology advantages.
----
载入中...
载入中...
04.04.2013 - 02:05
As I said with the proper attention and tweaking I would love to see this implimented.
----
I hate to advocate drugs alcohol and violence to the kids, but it's always worked for me.
载入中...
载入中...
07.05.2013 - 10:56
Bump.
载入中...
载入中...
07.05.2013 - 19:10
Why is this not in the game yet
----
载入中...
载入中...
08.05.2013 - 11:46
Bacause it's not ripe yet.
----
载入中...
载入中...
08.05.2013 - 14:50
Vladimir Lenin
账户已删除
作者: Columna Durruti, 08.05.2013 at 11:46

Bacause it's not ripe yet.
I thought Fruit put balanced govs.
载入中...
载入中...
08.05.2013 - 16:54
Its not even on the wish list >_<
----
载入中...
载入中...
09.05.2013 - 09:24
Shadowism: all units in city's are invisible but -1 def for units in a city and +10 cost

plus this is a game you can make any type of government you want even one's that don't exist
载入中...
载入中...
18.08.2013 - 10:30
BUMP BUMP BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
----
载入中...
载入中...
29.08.2013 - 02:06
I had almost forgot about this idea. Still sounds good.
----


[img]Picture[/img]
载入中...
载入中...
29.08.2013 - 07:02
I still support this
----
载入中...
载入中...
29.11.2013 - 16:47
Death1812
账户已删除
Support HUEHUEHUE!!!
载入中...
载入中...
05.12.2013 - 11:16
Some of these suggestions are very OP, but I trust the moderators and admins will be cautious with this.
This suggestion has my support.
载入中...
载入中...
20.12.2014 - 08:11
Why not make slider bonuses? For example,

Open Society (faster units) < 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 > Totalitarianism (stronger units)

Nationalist (more reinf. at home) < 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 > Cosmopolitan (more income abroad)

Moralism (faster pop. growth) < 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 > Secular State (faster income growth)

Laissez-faire (faster income growth) < 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 > Planned Economy (higher base income)

etc. etc. This will give much higher variety to your government type.
载入中...
载入中...
20.12.2014 - 08:16
Rankist Sharck
账户已删除
作者: International, 20.12.2014 at 08:11

Why not make slider bonuses? For example,

Open Society (faster units) < 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 > Totalitarianism (stronger units)

Nationalist (more reinf. at home) < 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 > Cosmopolitan (more income abroad)

Moralism (faster pop. growth) < 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 > Secular State (faster income growth)

Laissez-faire (faster income growth) < 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 > Planned Economy (higher base income)

etc. etc. This will give much higher variety to your government type.
Open Society looks UP imo. Stronger + Better income/reinf + blitz = op
载入中...
载入中...
20.12.2014 - 08:22
作者: Guest, 20.12.2014 at 08:16
Open Society looks UP imo. Stronger + Better income/reinf + blitz = op

That was an example for demonstration purposes.
It is by no means an example of a developed or balanced system.
载入中...
载入中...
20.12.2014 - 08:47
Cool a roleplay strategy
----
Hi
载入中...
载入中...
20.12.2014 - 09:32
Rankist Sharck
账户已删除
作者: Legendary Hero, 20.12.2014 at 08:47

Cool a roleplay strategy
NO
NO JUST NO
NO NO NO
载入中...
载入中...
21.12.2014 - 08:56
作者: Skanderbeg, 21.12.2014 at 06:28

Yugoslavia had that system you just explained above, and result was widespread corruption [as central government didnt had power over autonomous cities and regions] which led to Socialist failure/Yugoslav War/Living standard drop.

The Stalinist Soviet Union also had it's own corrupt political elite... corruption is plaguing all systems... don't blame it to one system, blame it to power/domination of on (or two) elites over others.
----
载入中...
载入中...
21.12.2014 - 09:18
作者: Skanderbeg, 21.12.2014 at 09:10

But it is easier to combat 'elite' corruption than petty corruption.

Not really.
German saying: "Die kleinen Diebe hängt man, die großen läßt man laufen."
(The little thieves are hanged and the big ones are allowed to run.)
----
载入中...
载入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隐私条例 | 服务条例 | 横额 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我们在

将游戏传播出去!